Gramling Law Firm, PLC
Call Today: 870-497-1994
  • Home
  • About The Firm
    • James F. Gramling, Jr.
  • Practice Areas
    • Business And Commercial Law
    • Creditors’ Rights / Debt Collection
    • Estate Planning
    • Probate
    • Mediation
    • Real Estate Law
  • Blog
  • Contact
  • Home
  • About The Firm
    • James F. Gramling, Jr.
  • Practice Areas
    • Business And Commercial Law
    • Creditors’ Rights / Debt Collection
    • Estate Planning
    • Probate
    • Mediation
    • Real Estate Law
  • Blog
  • Contact
  • Home
  • About The Firm
    • James F. Gramling, Jr.
  • Practice Areas
    • Business And Commercial Law
    • Creditors’ Rights / Debt Collection
    • Estate Planning
    • Probate
    • Mediation
    • Real Estate Law
  • Blog
  • Contact
Email
Call

Large firm knowledge.
Small firm attention.

  1. Home
  2.  | 
  3. Business Law
  4.  | 
  5. Arkansas Court of Appeals Upholds Attorney’s Fee Award in Contract Case

Arkansas Court of Appeals Upholds Attorney’s Fee Award in Contract Case

On Behalf of Gramling Law Firm, PLC | Oct 1, 2025 | Business Law |

In Dark Knight Vending, LLC v. Allen d/b/a Feeze Kutz Barber Shop (Apr. 15, 2024), the Arkansas Court of Appeals affirmed a $6,555 attorney’s fee award to Felicia Allen after she successfully defended a breach-of-contract claim.

Background: Dark Knight claimed it had an exclusive agreement to place gaming machines in Allen’s barber shop and sued for more than $100,000 in damages. The jury rejected Dark Knight’s contract claim against Allen. Allen filed a counterclaim against Dark Knight that was dismissed by directed verdict.

In Arkansas, a court may award attorney’s fees in contract cases to the “prevailing party.” But who qualifies as the “prevailing party” can sometimes be murky.

On appeal, Dark Knight argued that (1) no party “prevailed,” (because Allen’s counterclaim was dismissed and the parties were left in the same position they started in) and (2) the fee was unreasonable. The court disagreed, holding:

  • Allen was the prevailing party because she defeated Dark Knight’s contract claim, even though her own counterclaim was dismissed.
  • The circuit judge acted within his discretion in awarding roughly half of the $12,779 requested, based on detailed billing and the court’s familiarity with the case.

Takeaway: In Arkansas, a party who successfully defends against a major claim can be treated as the prevailing party and recover fees. Courts have wide latitude in setting fee amounts, and appellate courts will rarely overturn those decisions.

Recent Posts

  • Arkansas Court Enforces No-Contest Clause After Beneficiary Challenges Lost Will
  • Arkansas Prescriptive Easement Law: Court Rejects Claim Over Rural Farm Road
  • Is a Deed a Deed if it’s not recorded?
  • Arkansas Court of Appeals Upholds Attorney’s Fee Award in Contract Case
  • When a Bargain Isn’t a Bargain: Buying Property from the Commissioner of State Lands

Archives

  • February 2026
  • December 2025
  • October 2025
  • June 2025
  • May 2025

Categories

  • Business Law
  • Firm News
  • Real Estate Law

RSS Feed

Subscribe To This Blog’s Feed

Integrity. Professionalism. Timely Responses.

Email Gramling Law Firm, PLC, to initiate a consultation.

Gramling Law Firm, PLC

Address

2500 Alexander Drive, Suite B
Jonesboro, AR 72401

Call: 870-497-1994

Jonesboro Office
  • Follow
Review The Firm

© 2026 Gramling Law Firm, PLC • All Rights Reserved

Disclaimer | Site Map | Privacy Policy | Business Development Solutions by FindLaw